<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wireless Keyboards &#8211; 2.4ghz vs 27mhz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cherrykeyboardsrus.co.uk/11/wireless-keyboards-24ghz-vs-27mhz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cherrykeyboardsrus.co.uk/11/wireless-keyboards-24ghz-vs-27mhz/</link>
	<description>Wired and Wireless Keyboards, Mice, from Cherry Keyboards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:05:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin Bithrey</title>
		<link>http://blog.cherrykeyboardsrus.co.uk/11/wireless-keyboards-24ghz-vs-27mhz/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Bithrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cherrykeyboardsrus.co.uk/11/wireless-keyboards-24ghz-vs-27mhz/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Thankls for the info, I&#039;m pretty sure that my colleagues in Germany, who are basically the designers of the products, would be familiar with the technologies involved, but for reasons unknown to me at this time, have chosen to go down the route of 2.4ghz devices which don&#039;t have changeable properties. Previously with some older devices, we did have DIP switches, which could change the ID of the devices used, but this was to ensure that there was no cross interference, which is resolved with the individual channel selection in these new devices. 

We&#039;re obviously not sure whether anything will change with future products appearing, but we&#039;ll obviously keep an eye on the products to see if there is any requirement for moving technologies.

Hope this is okay!

Robin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Thankls for the info, I&#8217;m pretty sure that my colleagues in Germany, who are basically the designers of the products, would be familiar with the technologies involved, but for reasons unknown to me at this time, have chosen to go down the route of 2.4ghz devices which don&#8217;t have changeable properties. Previously with some older devices, we did have DIP switches, which could change the ID of the devices used, but this was to ensure that there was no cross interference, which is resolved with the individual channel selection in these new devices. </p>
<p>We&#8217;re obviously not sure whether anything will change with future products appearing, but we&#8217;ll obviously keep an eye on the products to see if there is any requirement for moving technologies.</p>
<p>Hope this is okay!</p>
<p>Robin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tyz</title>
		<link>http://blog.cherrykeyboardsrus.co.uk/11/wireless-keyboards-24ghz-vs-27mhz/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 18:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cherrykeyboardsrus.co.uk/11/wireless-keyboards-24ghz-vs-27mhz/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>On your 2.4Ghz systems you could use a different method of  binding (pairing) the devices so replacements or changes in addresses could be accomplished.  Many devices using the Nordic Semiconductor chipset utiltizes Both Dynamic and Static pairing. www.nordicsemi.com

Thanks,

Jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On your 2.4Ghz systems you could use a different method of  binding (pairing) the devices so replacements or changes in addresses could be accomplished.  Many devices using the Nordic Semiconductor chipset utiltizes Both Dynamic and Static pairing. <a href="http://www.nordicsemi.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nordicsemi.com</a></p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
